Rep. Stewart, other Utah congressmen join yes vote for keeping same-sex and interracial marriage legal

Stock image | Photo by arsenisspyros/iStock/Getty Images Plus, St. George News

ST. GEORGE — Congressman Chris Stewart, who represents Southern Utah, joined 47 other Republicans in voting Tuesday to approve a House bill that would take previous Supreme Court decisions that legalized same-sex and interracial marriage and codify them into law.

Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah) speaks during GOP Lincoln Day Luncheon, Cedar City, Utah, Feb. 12, 2022 | Photo by Jeff Richards, St. George News / Cedar City News

The Respect for Marriage Act was approved 257-167, with Stewart and the three other Utah Congress members among the 51 Republicans voting in the affirmative along with all 220 Democrats.

The bill would formalize same-sex and interracial marriage into federal law. Interracial marriage was legalized nationwide in the 1967 Loving v. Virginia decision, while same-sex marriage won the same protection from the high court in 2015 in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Proponents of the bill pointed to a concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the recent Supreme Court decision, which ended the constitutional right to abortion and allowed states to set laws restricting or banning the practice, saying it puts the legalization of both same-sex and interracial marriage at risk.

In the opinion, Thomas said the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision should cause the high court to “reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents.”

In a file photo, Carlos McKnight of Washington waves a flag in support of gay marriage outside of the Supreme Court in Washington D.C., June 26, 2015 | Associated Press file photo by Jacquelyn Martin, St. George News

The concurrence mentioned Obergefell as well as decisions that legalized contraception and same-sex sexual relations, and Loving was also a decision determined on substantive due process.

During the debate, opponents of the bill said it was an attempt to intimidate the Supreme Court and also said the bill had not had formal committee hearings.

It’s unclear when or if the Senate will take up the bill.

According to Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute, codifying a Supreme Court decision does not necessarily make it impossible for the Supreme Court to still overturn the previous decision, though the burden becomes harder. Also, a future Congress could overturn the law.

Copyright St. George News, SaintGeorgeUtah.com LLC, 2022, all rights reserved.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!