Pine View bomber case to move forward, but will it be in juvenile or adult court?

ST. GEORGE — The case involving a 16-year-old boy accused of bringing a homemade bomb to one school and causing ISIS-related vandalism at another will move forward after a judge ruled Wednesday that prosecutors had met their burden of proof.

“The court determined there was probable cause,” Matthew Harris, one of the teen suspect’s attorneys, said. “That standard is so low we anticipated the court probably would, because all the court needed to determine is that there was some evidence to support each element of the crime alleged.”

5th District Juvenile Court Judge Paul E. Dame’s ruling followed closing arguments from the state and the defense.

Pine View High School students are evacuated to the football field as police investigate a bomb scare inside the school, St. George, Utah, March 5, 2018 | File photo by Mori Kessler, St. George News

Both restated elements of testimony and evidence surrounding the March 5 bomb incident at Pine View High School and the earlier ISIS vandalism incident at Hurricane High School Feb. 15.

The teen faces first-degree felony charges for attempted murder and possession of a weapon of mass destruction in connection with the bomb scare that prompted the evacuation of 1,100 students.

The alleged bomb was found in a backpack the accused left in the school’s cafeteria.

The teen also faces lesser charges stemming from when he allegedly replaced an American flag at Hurricane High School with an ISIS flag and spray-painted an ISIS-related message on school property.

Wednesday’s hearing wrapped up the first half of the overall hearing that continues July 5. At that time the judge will hear arguments on whether the boy should stay in the juvenile court system or proceed to district court where he will be tried as an adult.

Closing arguments

Intent to kill vs. intent to scare

Deputy Washington County Attorney Angela Adams argued it was the teen’s intent to kill others and that his actions and words were proof of that.

(The teen) intended to build an explosive device, a ‘bomb’ as he called it, and intended to kill people.”

The defense argued the teen’s intent wasn’t to kill, but to scare.

Police investigators asked the boy what the idea behind the incident was.

“(The teen) said, ‘Fear factor, I guess,’” Harris said. “His intent was not to kill, he was wanting to scare.”

Deputy Washington County Attorney Angela Adams at a preliminary hearing for a teen accused of attempting to detonate a bomb inside Pine View High School, St. George, Utah, June 27, 2018 | Photo by Chris Caldwell via Utah court pool, St. George News

Read more: Teen in Pine View High School bomb scare wanted to ’cause fear,’ prosecution witnesses say

Adams argued the boy wanted to cause death in addition to fear.

“He researched (the bomb), he built it, he placed it, he lit it and he moved out of the way.”

Adams said that when the boy set the backpack on the ground and attempted to light it with a match, it failed. He tried again and when it seemed to work, he jumped back and left the area.

“He acted like a person who expected it to explode,” she said.

Incendiary device vs. explosive device

The defense argued the so-called bomb was more a “backpack with flammable materials” in it than an actual explosive device and cited testimony from an FBI explosives expert.

Read more: Judge to consider adult court for teen accused of attempted bombing at high school

FBI special agent Michael Truebenbach said it was an incendiary device – a device meant to trigger a fire rather than explode outright, Harris said.

An incendiary device could be a weapon, or a firework or how you start a campfire, he said. “Just because it’s an incendiary device does not prove it’s a weapon and does not prove it’s capable of killing with reasonable certainty.”

L-R: Defense attorneys Stephen Harris and Matthew Harris at a preliminary hearing for a teen accused of attempting to detonate a bomb inside Pine View High School, St. George, Utah, June 27, 2018 | Photo by Chris Caldwell via Utah court pool, St. George News

Still, that doesn’t change that the teen’s intent was to build an explosive, Adams said, especially given that he had placed bottles of gasoline, shrapnel and other items in the backpack.

Read more: ‘If someone got hurt, I probably wouldn’t care’; Teen charged with attempted murder in Pine View High bomb scare

St. George Police officer Gage Schimbeck, who responded to Pine View High and who is a member of the Washington County Bomb Squad, testified that inside the backpack was a metal soup can filled with what appeared to be a “significant amount” of gunpowder and BBs that were later identified to be shotgun pellets. Attached to the can was a fuse made of masking tape, a matchbox, three water bottles filled with an amber-colored liquid he believed to be gasoline.

“The court can draw the inference that those items were only in there because (the teen) intended to them to be there as a part of an explosive device,” Adams said.

In his own words’

The defense pointed to a letter the boy wrote in which he provided his feelings and motivation behind the Pine View High incident.

The boy wrote that he knew the bomb wasn’t perfect and therefore wouldn’t work, Harris said, adding that it was another sign his client did not intend to kill anyone, only scare them.

5th District Juvenile Court Judge Paul E. Dame hears closing arguments at a preliminary hearing for a teen accused of attempting to detonate a bomb inside Pine View High School, St. George, Utah, June 27, 2018 | Photo by Chris Caldwell via Utah court pool, St. George News

“‘It did what I expected it to do – burn out and smoke,’” Harris read from the letter.

As the device wasn’t a bomb, Mathew Harris argued, it really couldn’t qualify as a weapon of mass destruction either.

Adams called the defense’s attempt to downplay the intent a “red herring.”

She referenced a passage in the letter that reads, “‘I began to think of ways I could do it – ways I could kill those that would do wrong.’”

He also wrote that he searched the internet for ways to create bombs and explosives that would cause “great destruction” as well as flammable and explosive items that could be combined, Adams said.

“‘I knew what I needed. I made plans to build it and set it,’” Adams said, reading the boy’s words. “In his own words, your honor, he wanted it to explode and he wanted it to kill.”

The defense afterward

Issues that weren’t brought up during closing arguments were those that arose during the testimony of forensic psychologist Tim Kockler. He said the teen had an undiagnosed case of high-functioning autism and cognitive impairment that makes it hard for him to understand and relate to others, which led to a lifetime of being bullied.

Forensic psychologist Tim Kockler testifies at a preliminary hearing for a teen accused of attempting to detonate a bomb inside Pine View High School, St. George, Utah, June 20, 2018 | File photo by Chris Caldwell via Utah court pool, St. George News

Read more: Defense’s witness says autism, bullying played part in bomb scare case

“We’re not claiming it’s an excuse for what happened by any means,” said Stephen Harris, the boy’s other attorney.

“We need to put ourselves in the position of a young man with these difficulties and judge him in that regard rather than (for example) as a gang member member that spends his life committing crime.

“That’s simply not the case here. Did he make an error in judgment and make the wrong choice and cause a lot of people to fear and panic, well, the state alleges that. Might there be some explanation for that that needs to come out? We think there is. This is not a defense, just an explanation of what happened.”

Matthew Harris said this is not the case the state should use to set an example for reacting to school violence.

I see this as an example of a kid who his whole life was bullied because of mental health issues. Personally, I see it as another example where the state is using him and his oddities as a way of putting forth an agenda which probably isn’t the best case in my opinion to be doing that.”

School violence is an epidemic, but a putting teen with mental health issues into the adult court system and possibly into prison isn’t the answer, he said.

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @MoriKessler

Copyright St. George News, LLC, 2018, all rights reserved.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

1 Comment

  • Ladyk June 29, 2018 at 1:28 am

    Now they claim it was just meant to scare and cause fear. Well I would say he succeeded. My daughter was within 3 feet of it and I could hear the fear in her voice when she called me to tell me that they were being rushed out of the school because of a bomb and she wanted me to know she loved me, just in case something happened. Yeah, I’m not buying that causing fear was his only goal but he did cause a lot of fear.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.