Experts: ‘Alarming’ drought conditions hit U.S. Southwest

Rafters float down the Colorado River near Moab, Utah, July 25, 2017. | Associated Press file photo by Dan Elliott, St. George News

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — Rivers and watering holes are drying up, popular mountain recreation spots are closing and water restrictions are in full swing as a persistent drought intensifies its grip on pockets of the American Southwest.

Climatologists and other experts on Wednesday provided an update on the situation in the Four Corners region — where Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Utah meet. They say the area is among the hardest hit and there’s little relief expected, and even robust summer rains might not be enough to replenish the soil and ease the fire danger.

The region is dealing with exceptional drought — the worst category. That has left farmers, ranchers and water planners bracing for a much different situation than just a year ago when only a fraction of the region was experiencing low levels of dryness.

Tapestry Wall and Warm Springs Canyon, Lake Powell, Utah, date unspecified | Photo courtesy of Nathan Zaugg, St. George News

Brian Fuchs, a climatologist with the National Drought Mitigation Center in Nebraska, said people are become more aware and more concerned.

“We’ve been on this pattern where conditions have dried out, we haven’t seen much relief through last summer or into the winter months and here we are going into the summer of 2018 with over two-thirds of the region already in drought,” he said. “So that’s alarming to say the least.”

Portions of the four states are seeing near-record to record dryness. Fuchs explained that some spots have missed out over the last two years on more than 12 inches of precipitation — which can add up to as much as a year’s worth of rain under normal conditions.

Warmer-than-average temperatures haven’t helped as the soil dries out and water demands increase.

With the region’s resources strained, a top federal official has resumed pressure on states in the Southwest to wrap up long-delayed emergency plans for potential shortages on the Colorado River, which serves 40 million people in the U.S. and Mexico.

“We face an overwhelming risk on the system, and the time for action is now,” Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Brenda Burman said Tuesday. She spoke before the Imperial Irrigation District in Southern California, one of the biggest single users of the Colorado River.

The drought has hit the Colorado River hard. Forecasters say the river will carry only about 43 percent of its average amount of water this year into Lake Powell, one of two big reservoirs on the system.

In New Mexico, stretches of the Rio Grande — another one of North America’s longest rivers — have already gone dry as biologists have been forced to scoop up as many endangered Rio Grande silvery minnows as possible so they can be moved upstream.

The river this summer is expected to dry as far north as Albuquerque, New Mexico’s most populous city. The area saw its first major dose of rain this week, ending a 54-day dry spell. It wasn’t enough to make up for months without meaningful precipitation.

Management of the Rio Grande and the groundwater associated with it is at the center of a legal battle that has been simmering before the U.S. Supreme Court since 2013.

New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas late Tuesday filed counterclaims against Texas and the federal government, saying they also bear responsibility to ensure proper allocation and accounting of water if the region hopes to have a sustainable future.

“While this case initially should have been resolved without filing a costly lawsuit, I am excited New Mexico will finally get to tell its unified story about how Texas and the United States have unfairly tried to scapegoat New Mexico,” Balderas said Wednesday.

Texas officials are reviewing New Mexico’s claims.

Balderas, who inherited the case from former Attorney General Gary King, said he’s still hoping to resolve the lawsuit but wants to protect New Mexicans from paying “an unjust price.”

It could be years before the court issues a ruling on the merits of the case. Depending on the outcome, New Mexico could be forced to pay millions of dollars in damages despite the state’s claims that water deliveries have been met and that Texas hasn’t suffered damages.

Written by SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN, Associated Press

Associated Press journalist Dan Elliott in Denver contributed to this report.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

14 Comments

  • hiker75 May 24, 2018 at 7:54 am

    It probably does not apply to Washington County. We seem to have an abundant amount of water. Or, so it appears from the lack of conservation here. Are there any water restrictions in the county?

    • NotSoFast May 24, 2018 at 8:37 am

      Maybe the source of Washington County water, the source the Virgin river, hasn’t seen the severity yet.

      • Brian May 24, 2018 at 2:27 pm

        It isn’t that. The Water Conservancy District intentionally doesn’t WAN’T to conserve water (ironic, given their name and stated purpose for existing) because if we don’t have a perceived water problem there is no reason to build the Powell Pipeline. Do you think we can spend 3 BILLION dollars and not have a bunch of it stick to the fingers of the local politicians involved (through insider land purchases or more nefarious means)?

    • Real Life May 24, 2018 at 12:19 pm

      It’s ok, God will provide. Unfortunately, that’s the attitude you’ll face from the majority here.

  • Scott May 24, 2018 at 10:44 am

    But sure, let’s keep developing Washington County!

  • Foxyheart May 24, 2018 at 12:18 pm

    Oh yes, we must not be in a drought because they are developing to the south for thousands of homes and going to put in lakes for faster water evaporation. Whoever passed this project, shall we say, has his/her/their collective heads where the sun does not shine. Ludicrous.

    • NotSoFast May 24, 2018 at 2:20 pm

      Why don’t you ask the mayor if you can park your single-wide trailer down by the new proposed lake? I’m sure the mayor will accommodate you and tell you to park it where the sun don’t shine. Some place in Clark county, maybe.

    • comments May 24, 2018 at 4:02 pm

      Nah, too much work for foxy to move his trailer. Just grease the mayor a bit $$$ and he can get his own lake built for the trailer park, and maybe even a carousel and miniature ride-on train to go w/ the lake. 😉

  • RadRabbit May 24, 2018 at 2:35 pm

    California needs to honestly tap into desalination and leave our inland water supplies for inland communities.

    • comments May 24, 2018 at 3:58 pm

      desalination costs $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. You are a very silly boy, like Mr. pipeline down there. Totally naive of costs.

  • statusquo May 24, 2018 at 3:07 pm

    There is plenty of water in the US. Read the news about flooding in other parts of the country. Water just needs to be distributed to the areas where it is needed. This could be done by pipelines like oil is moved between states. The problem with water in the US is a lack of management, not a shortage.

    • comments May 24, 2018 at 3:57 pm

      It isn’t cheap to move water around in pipelines, bubba. Wait till we all start paying for the LPP. Billions of dollars for a pipe that isn’t that great of a distance.

      • Rafiki May 24, 2018 at 10:05 pm

        Yup, oil is around $60 a barrel, most of that cost is probably ‘moving it’. So “we” start charging for water the way oil is…. that’s 70 cents a gallon.

        Make you want to take a quick shower no?

        Average American shower takes 17 gallons: $12 bucks a shower, $84 dollars a week, $336 a month, $4,032….per person

        Yup let’s build some piplines!!!

  • utahdiablo May 24, 2018 at 10:04 pm

    Make sure you flush twice…it’s a long way to Ron Thompsons office….but yes keep building here just like las Vegas is doing, we have to keep up

Leave a Reply