Utah, 3 other states accuse Arizona water utility of manipulating flow from Colorado River

A high-flow experimental water release at the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River, Page, Ariz., circa 2013 | Photo courtesy of U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, St. George News

DENVER (AP) — Tension over the drought-stressed Colorado River escalated into a public feud when four U.S. states accused Arizona’s largest water provider of manipulating supply and demand, potentially threatening millions of people in the United States and Mexico who rely on the river.

The four states – Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming – plus Denver’s water utility said the Central Arizona Project was trying to avoid a reduction in its share of the Colorado River while others are voluntarily cutting back to avoid a crisis amid a prolonged drought.

Colorado River as it flows through Marble Canyon looking east from the Navajo Bridge, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Arizona, Jan. 1, 2018 | Photo by Reuben Wadsworth, St. George News

“It’s one water user taking advantage of a situation for their own benefit, to the detriment of a river that supplies nearly 40 million people,” said Jim Lochhead, manager of Denver Water, which gets about half its supply from the Colorado River.

The Central Arizona Project denied the allegations and said it’s been conserving. The utility uses canals, pipelines and aqueducts to carry water 336 miles from the Colorado River to about 5 million people in central and southern Arizona.

The Colorado River is the lifeblood of the southwestern U.S. and northwestern Mexico, but it’s under increasing strain because demand is rising while the river is shrinking. Researchers blame an 18-year drought and climate change for the decline.

The outlook is getting worse. Last winter was exceptionally dry across most of the central and southern Rocky Mountains, so there will be below-average melting snow to feed the river.

The dispute over the Central Arizona Project revolves around how much water flows from the upper part of the Colorado River system to the lower. The upper part, called the Upper Basin, includes the four states challenging the Arizona utility. The Lower Basin includes Arizona, California and Nevada.

A riverboat glides through Lake Mead on the Colorado River at Hoover Dam near Boulder City, Nev., Oct. 14, 2015 | Associated Press file photo by Jae C. Hong, St. George News

Each basin is entitled to about half the river’s water under rules laid out in a collection of interstate agreements, court rulings and international treaties. To make sure the Lower Basin states get their share, the Upper Basin states send water from the massive Lake Powell reservoir to the even bigger Lake Mead reservoir downstream. In 2007, the Upper Basin states agreed to send Lake Mead additional water if conditions were right to keep that reservoir from dropping too low.

The Upper Basin states now claim the Central Arizona Project is manipulating its share in a way that keeps Lake Mead low enough that the Upper Basin is required to send extra water, but high enough to avoid mandatory cutbacks in Lower Basin consumption.

Ted Cooke, general manager of the Central Arizona Project, called that level the “sweet spot.” In remarks posted on the project’s website, he indicated the utility wants to keep Lake Mead there for as long as possible.

That prompted the four Upper Basin states to send Arizona an unusually blunt letter Friday. They accused the Central Arizona Project of ignoring the river’s dire condition and endangering water supplies for millions of people. They warned they wouldn’t voluntarily conserve water if the Arizona utility was going to take it.

In an interview, the Colorado representative who signed the letter, James Eklund, said the Arizona utility has made “gaming the system” a policy goal. “That’s just not conducive to collaboration.”

Lochhead sent his own letter to Arizona officials on Monday, saying Denver Water would stop contributing to a fund that promotes Colorado River conservation unless the Central Arizona Project stopped manipulating the river.

In a tweet last week, Cooke denied the utility was manipulating the river and described its practices as wise management.

He declined comment this week through a spokeswoman. The utility released a written statement saying it was surprised and disappointed by the Upper Basin states’ letter and wanted to “clarify apparent misunderstandings.”

What happens next wasn’t immediately clear. Eklund said the topic could come up at meetings this month among the Colorado River states and federal officials.

The states have a long history of cooperating on ways to conserve the waterway, Eklund said, and the Upper Basin states want that to continue.

He said they can’t afford to wait, because another dry winter could trigger mandatory cutbacks for water users under the rules governing the river.

“We’re really hoping that we get good precipitation, but that is not something we can control,” Eklund said. “What we can control is how we deal with each other.”

Written by DAN ELLIOTT, Associated Press

Email: news@stgnews.com

Twitter: @STGnews

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

6 Comments

  • Real Life April 19, 2018 at 12:24 pm

    Better hurry up and build that silly straw to a half dried up lake before it’s too late!

  • DRT April 19, 2018 at 2:28 pm

    I emailed WCWCD asking if the use of Lake Powell water was assured, or if we are going to be fighting lengthy court battles over it. I guess it isn’t surprising that they did not bother to respond to the email.

  • PogoStik April 19, 2018 at 3:30 pm

    Fact is there is only so much water in Lake Powell. This guarantees there WILL be fighting over these dimishing resources. The states with the most lawyer resources will ultimately win the most water whether or not it is a fair share. Utah will be saddled with a billion dollar LPP pipeline debt, so won’t have the financial resources to afford as many lawyers. The LLP will risk becoming just another Utah dinosaur.

    • utahdiablo April 20, 2018 at 8:49 am

      More like $2 Billion….but what’s a Billion or two amongst friends and family….build until you cannot build anymore….Las Vegas must not have gotten the memo as it’s building faster than the St George area

      • comments April 20, 2018 at 10:33 pm

        4-8 billion is my guess

  • Striker4 April 19, 2018 at 6:37 pm

    Let the water wars begin

Leave a Reply