Letter to the Editor: The Freedom of Information Act is the speedometer on your car, not the cop writing tickets

Stock image, St. George News

OPINION — Sunshine Week is here, and we who value government transparency are again celebrating the laws that allow us to know what our local, state and federal governments are doing.

But laws aren’t as popular as they used to be. One person’s reasonable statute is another person’s burdensome government regulation, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is no exception. Look at what the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is proposing.

The Washington Post recently published a memo in which the BLM, which manages a swath of Utah equal to two-fifths of the state, proposes streamlining a number of environmental reviews and regulations or asks Congress to do so. Nestled within the proposals to eliminate what the BLM considers duplicative and unnecessary regulations holding up oil, gas and mining projects are changes to FOIA.

The memo proposes limiting “the number of FOIA requests from any one group” and increasing the fees associated with FOIA requests. The BLM also proposes protecting the information that state and local government share with it. Put another way, the proposal would make a federal agency vital to the health of the West simpler by making it harder to learn what it is doing.

It’s not the first time someone has argued that disclosing government happenings is a burden on the government. Back in 2011, as Utah legislators were gutting the state’s public records law through a bill called HB477, one of their arguments was that records requests had become a burden for state and local governments.

Utah legislators also made the argument — much as the language in the BLM memo does — that record laws serve the special interest of some “group,” whether that group be journalists or advocacy agencies. Yet examinations tend to show record laws benefit journalists, advocates and average citizens, and a change to limit one of these groups winds up harming access for everyone.

To the Legislature’s credit, it realized its mistake and repealed HB477 not long after Gov. Gary Herbert signed it. Here’s hoping the BLM realizes its error before it’s ever made.

Saying record laws are a burden on government is like saying the speedometer and fuel gauge are burdens on a car. Both record laws and dashboard displays tell you what their respective vehicles are doing and whether there are problems.

The American taxpayers are the ones who gas up the BLM, and restricting FOIA will only make them more ignorant about the decisions being made and why. For that matter, it’s not as if the BLM is buried in FOIA requests.

According to the Interior Department’s annual report, the BLM received 1,024 FOIA requests in fiscal year 2017. That’s not much for an agency that manages one-eighth of the country’s land mass. It’s not even among the top agencies receiving requests within the Interior Department.

The National Park Service, the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service all received more FOIA requests than the BLM. For further reference, in calendar year 2017, Salt Lake City’s municipal government received 468 record requests through its online filing system.

If the BLM really wants to reduce record requests, it could be more proactive. Post more data, correspondence and other records online so FOIA isn’t necessary.

But restricting FOIA does a disservice to the people the BLM is working for — those who work on, play on and care for public lands. The proposal also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of FOIA. It’s no burden to tell the people what the government is doing. It’s good government.

Submitted by the UTAH HEADLINERS, the state’s largest chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists. The Headliners are leading a public records training 9 a.m. Saturday at Weber State University. Learn more at https://twitter.com/UtahSPJ.

Letters to the Editor are not the product of St. George News, its editors, staff or contributors. The matters stated and opinions given are the responsibility of the person submitting them; they do not reflect the product or opinion of St. George News.

Email news@stgnews.com

Twitter: @STGnews

Copyright St. George News, SaintGeorgeUtah.com LLC, 2018, all rights reserved.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!


  • statusquo March 11, 2018 at 9:19 am

    Sounds good in theory, but I know from first hand experience that the FOIA can and is abused. Environmental whackos have discovered that you can essentially shutdown a federal agency with a stream of FOIA requests. The staff time it takes to respond to the requests can paralyze an organization. Lawsuits are another tactic.

    The FOIA system needs to be restructureed. The true cost to provide data in the form requested should be reimbursed by the group requesting it.

    • bikeandfish March 11, 2018 at 10:08 am

      Charging a set administrative fee is fine but charging “the true cost” would be punitive and rife for abuse. It doesn’t matter whether it is “environmental whackos”, journalist, universities, NGOs. Transparency and freedom of information are defining qualities of a democracy and agencies designed to serve the public good.

      And as they said, it would be simple enough to automatically generate most of the information as freely available reports on the internet and reduce the number of FOIA requests. The only reason not to do so is if there is something to hide (whether for legally justified reasons, convenience or malfeasance)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.