Democrats pressure Trump to not rescind Bears Ears monument

Composite image, St. George News

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (AP) — Western Democrats are pressuring President Donald Trump not to rescind land protections put in place by President Barack Obama, including Utah’s Bears Ears National Monument, a designation strongly opposed by Utah Republicans.

Obama infuriated Utah Republicans when he created the monument in late December 2016.

Read more: Utah Republicans bristle at Bears Ears National Monument designation

While the 1.3 million acres of land is sacred to Native Americans and home to tens of thousands of archaeological sites, including ancient cliff dwellings, and found support among some Native Americans, other Native Americans in San Juan County where the monument is located opposed the monument.

Read more: Utah Republicans continue stand against potential ‘midnight monument’

In this June 22, 2016 file photo, the “House on Fire” ruins in Mule Canyon, near Blanding, Utah in Bears Ears National Monument. Western Democrats are pressuring President Donald Trump not to rescind land protections put in place by President Barack Obama, including for Utah’s Bears Ears National Monument. | AP Photo/Rick Bowmer, File, St. George News

Republicans have asked Trump to take the unusual step of reversing the designation, saying it will add another layer of unnecessary federal control and close the area to new energy development.

Read more: Senate confirms Zinke as Interior secretary amid Utah’s monument fight

In a letter this week, nine Western Democratic senators wrote Trump to say that weakening protections for Bears Ears or any other national monument would be a direct affront to local communities and stakeholders.

“This is especially true in the case of Bears Ears National Monument, for the Native American tribes who call this living cultural landscape their ancestral home,” the Democratic senators wrote.

Many Utahns, however, including Native Americans, opposed the monument.

Rebecca Benally, a Navajo and a San Juan County commissioner, said President Obama would not be designating the monument for the local people, St. George News reported in December, but for groups that are using the Navajo to further their own agenda.

“My constituents do not want another national monument,” Benally said at the time.

The White House has said it is reviewing the decisions by the Obama administration to determine economic impacts, whether the law was followed and whether there was appropriate consultation with local officials.

In an ongoing back-and-forth with Republicans over the monument, Democrats on the House Natural Resources Committee released documents Thursday to try to bolster their argument that there was adequate consultation.

The documents from Arizona Rep. Raul Grijalva, the senior Democrat on the panel, detail repeated phone calls and visits between the Obama administration and Utah’s congressional delegation and governor.

The emails show that Utah officials hoped to work with the federal government on the issue before Obama designated the monument in the final days of his administration on Dec. 28. In an email on Dec. 21, as state officials grew increasingly concerned that the designation was coming, a member of Utah Gov. Gary Herbert’s staff wrote an Interior Department official and thanked her for her time.

“I’m not kidding when I say you’re an amazing example of a public servant,” wrote Herbert’s director of federal affairs, whose name was blacked out in the emails.

Democrats said the back-and-forth showed collaboration.

“If anyone wants to paint Bears Ears National Monument as a surprise or the product of rushed or incomplete planning, they’ll have to explain hundreds of emails and dozens of pages of shared work product,” Grijalva said.

A spokeswoman for House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Rob Bishop, R-Utah, fired back. The spokeswoman, Molly Block, said that releasing the documents was a “desperate attempt to create a façade of local support.”

When the designation was announced, Republicans in the state said it was an egregious abuse of executive power. It was opposed by the governor and the entire congressional delegation, in addition to many local residents.

Herbert said then that the designation “violated assurances made by (Obama’s) interior secretary to take into account local concerns before making a monument designation.”

In a statement Thursday, Paul Edwards, Herbert’s deputy chief of staff, said the documents released by Democrats illustrate that the state, the congressional delegation and the Interior Department worked for three years to try and find a solution together.

“The state of Utah is ready and willing to pick up the baton and work to resolve these issues through a fair, negotiated, legislative process once again,” Edwards said.

A spokeswoman for Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said Thursday he’s committed to traveling to Utah and other states to make recommendations for the president.

Written by MARY CLARE JALONICK, Associated Press. Associated Press writer Brady McCombs contributed to this report from Salt Lake City.

ST. GEORGE NEWS senior reporter Mori Kessler contributed to this report from St. George.

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @STGnews

AP content: Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

St. George News contributed content:

Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!


  • DRT April 14, 2017 at 11:07 am

    Of course the Democrats don’t want to see anything done to curtail the government from control of anything! They believe that government is the Big Daddy that will take care of everything, if just given the chance. They believe that we would all live in Utopia today, if not for those pesky Republicans!
    As far as any and all of the national whatevers that are supposedly “protected” by under agencies of The Department of the Interior, (or is it The Department Of The INFERIOR?) just how many people had ever even heard of Bears Ears, or Grand Staircase Escalante prior to their redesignation as national monuments? But the publicity surrounding those designations made them famous. Yep, way to protect them alright…

  • wilbur April 14, 2017 at 11:32 am

    Just cut it down to a more reasonable size, and make everyone equally unhappy.

    • mesaman April 14, 2017 at 8:19 pm

      Now this is a most sensible suggestion. Surely these elected officials can settle on much less than the massive land grab Obama laid out. Of course he would be hard put to tell you where it is and why it was so important, but then that is the socialist way.

      • comments April 16, 2017 at 10:53 am

        the socialist way huh? I’d be curious if we tallied up what you’re costing the tax payers every single year. A fully socialist state pension plan and paid health insurance are not cheap.

  • commonsense April 14, 2017 at 10:25 pm

    Trump should use this action as a bargaining chip with the Dems. Leave it in a reduced size if Dems will help fix Obama care. Negotiation requires give and take.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.