On the EDge: Worst presidential candidate slate ever

OPINION – The standard-bearers for the Republican and Democratic parties continue to bewilder the voting public.

The two presumptive nominees continue to bumble and stumble their way towards the conventions, which should provide even more shock and awe as the parties officially anoint their candidates.

That’s why I feel we are saddled by the worst presidential slate in modern history.

Going into these conventions, I can still make a valid argument that neither presumptive nominee will be on the ballot come November. Certainly, from a personal standpoint, it would be an agreeable resolution to Election 2016.

While Donald Trump ambled along in the muck, his latest faux pas, of course, a Tweet taking a jab at Hillary Clinton with his key barb printed over a Jewish Star of David, Clinton was once again the victim of her husband, who chose to hold his private jet on the tarmac in Phoenix so he could hop aboard Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s plane for a friendly chat.

It was a stupid move and one that, depending on what he actually said during that conversation, could be an actual crime, unlike what Hillary Clinton’s detractors are trying to dredge up.

Her behavior in this matter, may reveal bad judgment and arrogance, but as far as the law is concerned, she probably did nothing illegal when using her private email server. At least that is how it went when Secretary Colin Powell did the same thing from 2001 through 2005 when he served the George W. Bush administration. There were some sideways glances in his direction, but nobody investigated him or questioned his propriety. He remains highly respected among conservatives, at least traditional, old guard conservatives. The Tea Party bunch is probably a different matter.

Hillary Clinton has freely admitted she made a mistake, had a lapse of judgment, and sat with FBI investigators for more than three hours the other day giving her side of the story.

How she responded under those circumstances will determine if she has placed herself in any kind of legal jeopardy, at least as far as the email scandal is concerned.

Was she truthful? Did she try to evade or misrepresent the facts? How often has history proven that the cover-up usually leads to more serious circumstances than an alleged crime?

We really will not know until the FBI issues its recommendation regarding prosecution.

And, in all honesty, none of us know if she compromised classified information in those emails. We are not privy to that information and for the most part, the way we fall on this matter is largely a result of our political persuasion. If you are a conservative, you believe they should lock her up and throw away the key. If you are a liberal you believe no harm, no foul, arguing that the archaic and unstable government servers posed a greater security risk than using her private email server.

Some of us are awaiting some sort of real evidence, not some kneejerk, schoolyard nonsense about “Crooked Hillary” or the defensive posturing from the left about the ordeal not being “that big of a deal” before taking sides on this matter.

But, it becomes difficult to maintain a neutral position in light of Bill Clinton’s drop-in visit with Lynch.

Lynch’s connection to Bill Clinton goes back to 1999 when he nominated her for the position of U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

Now, in fairness to her, she has a reputation as an impartial prosecutor, attacking corruption on both sides, prosecuting Democrats and Republicans with equal vigor.

That’s why Bill Clinton’s insanely stupid decision to have a private, 30-minute discussion with her is off the charts and could send his wife limping into the convention, so much so that, at this moment, I would handicap her path to the nomination at about the same odds as Trump’s – 60-40. It all makes me wish Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump would both just go away.

The problem for Hillary Clinton, at this point is that she is covered even more in the stench of scandal now. If no charges are brought against her, it will be looked upon as political favoritism, a cover-up orchestrated by her husband and a Democratic Party that has done itself no favors in the way it has manipulated this election season.

If charges are filed, she’s done. She won’t go to prison, but her career and clout will be history.

It leaves her in a true, no-win situation.

If she carries on with her campaign, she faces the scandal on a daily basis.

If she drops out of the race, even if she is found to have done nothing illegal, she will live with this for the rest of her days.

There is, however, a greater good to be considered, and that is the integrity of the system.

I know it is an outdated concept, but our leaders should be beyond reproach, clear of scandal, and, most of all, trusted.

Presidents should be able to travel the world negotiate with other heads of state, and be looked upon with respect by the global community, without the shadow of scandal cast upon their path.



Perhaps a bit naïve?


But, if we don’t strive for the ideal, for the very best we can achieve, then we are selling ourselves, and everybody else, short.

That’s why I also cannot give my vote to Trump, or, probably, Bernie Sanders, because even though it will be meaningless as part of the Utah tally come election day – I seriously doubt my vote will mean anything or coincide with the conservative majority – I still respect the value of my vote, the integrity of it, the importance of it.

So I am going to hang in there and see what develops.

Right now, everybody is rushing to try to resolve the various negatives in both campaigns – from fraud charges to the email scandal – before the parties gather for the conventions.

I don’t think either side will succeed at doing that at this point, which means both will convene under clouds of doubt and suspicion.

The best we can hope for is that come November, both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are conspicuous by their absence from the ballot.

Although I am not a major fan of either, I would be much more comfortable with a race between Mitt Romney and Joe Biden, both of whom are quietly warming up in the bullpen. What about primary voters? To appease them they could place Ted Cruz and Elizabeth Warren to round out the ticket.

Will either be tapped to help their party save face?

Anything is possible in Election 2016.

Ed Kociela is an opinion columnist. The opinions stated in this article are his and not representative of St. George News.

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @STGnews, @EdKociela

Copyright St. George News, SaintGeorgeUtah.com LLC, 2016, all rights reserved.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!


  • .... July 5, 2016 at 9:48 am

    Two people two choose from on Super Twosday when we go two vote for one of the two. you should make up your mind on the way two the voting booths. make sure two vote !

  • beacon July 5, 2016 at 10:09 am

    True and I feel like sticking my head in the sand. Those who have helped put these two at the top have rationale that escapes me.

    • Bob July 5, 2016 at 12:38 pm

      notice how ‘the donald’ basically came out of nowhere and has been propped up the entire way by a monopolized corporate media. Hitler on the other hand has been trying to become dictator for at least the last 9 years. It’s a rigged game and the citizens lose with either of these narcissistic psychos. If u guys thought hussein was bad, just wait…

      • dogmatic July 5, 2016 at 1:45 pm

        Where have you been Bob? Trump did not come out of nowhere. Trumps been around a long time. Trump has used the political system to advance his business successfully, that puts him in a good position to see the political corruption firsthand.
        Yes, he said some nasty but truthfully things like.
        Hillary is dishonest.
        Carly was bad for HP and is ugly.
        Rosie Odonald uses her popularity as a platform for her stupid political option and she dos eat like a pig.
        Muslims do need to be vetted better before entering our county?
        True true true
        What’s your problem with trump ? Is he too politically incorrect for you.
        Pull your head out of the politically correct sand, Bob

        • .... July 5, 2016 at 2:42 pm

          Ha ha dumbob got told off ! Ha ha ha ha ha

        • Bob July 5, 2016 at 2:53 pm

          trump is part of the political corruption. if u think that he’ll clean up the game in any way u are dreaming. the time of expecting politics to change anything is over. we are all just along for the ride until something drastic changes. wouldn’t it be a wonderful world if someone actually could throw out the muslims and the illegals. i don’t see it happening with anything short of an uprising.

          • ladybugavenger July 5, 2016 at 8:35 pm

            Forget about the war on drugs. It’s not working. We need an uprising. An uprising against radical Islamic terrorist and illegals.

          • RealMcCoy July 6, 2016 at 11:30 am

            Well, your options are:
            Trump, the new guy, who says exactly what a lot of people are too afraid to say out loud or in public, and has actual plans to make America great again (or at least try)
            Hillary, the antichrist, who has a proven track record of deceit and disregard for the American people, and who can’t handle a simple email account yet feels she should be ruler of the free world.

      • ladybugavenger July 5, 2016 at 4:07 pm

        Trump for President

      • ladybugavenger July 5, 2016 at 4:09 pm

        I’ll vote for narcissistic psycho Trump. #neverhillary

        • .... July 5, 2016 at 6:51 pm

          LADYBUG FOR PREZ !!!!!!

        • Bob July 5, 2016 at 9:52 pm

          well at least the mormons don’t like him. I didn’t realize mormons were so pro-muslim and pro-illegal alien until trump came along

  • beacon July 5, 2016 at 2:36 pm

    You don’t have to be completely rude, inappropriate and prone to inciting mobs to get your point across. A person can state their case well and honestly and not fall victim to being labeled “too politically correct.” Donald, I fear, falls in the first example. He’s certainly not cut out to be president but may end up there, unfortunately.

  • Bob July 5, 2016 at 2:58 pm

    and trump has been a media darling since he announced his running. The media pretends to be opposed to him and yet he gets vast, almost non-stop hours of coverage. i can only conclude that he’s some type of controlled-opposition. it’s all just a show.

    • .... July 5, 2016 at 6:49 pm

      Yawwwwwwn tell us all about it

      • Bob July 5, 2016 at 9:53 pm

        the pills, dumpster… take ’em!

    • Curtis July 7, 2016 at 8:46 am

      Lots and lots of coverage and except for Fox news all negative. If you want to see examples of mass hysteria check out the opinion pages of the Washington Post.

  • Bob July 5, 2016 at 3:07 pm

    if hitlery becomes the next dictator she will find some excuse to pour millions of muslims into the country like the german dictator has done to them. it will be very bad.

    • Bob July 5, 2016 at 3:11 pm

      hitlery dreams of a police state and the muslims would be used as a tool to accomplish this. order through chaos using the hegelian dialectic.

  • Henry July 5, 2016 at 5:17 pm

    Ed Kociela is the worst opinion page writer ever. The St George News understandably wants articles about controversial subjects that generate lots of comments. But there are Associated Press articles that cover the same topics as Kociela, but without his consistent inclusion of factually incorrect statements.

    Either Kociela is too ignorant to know that he is stating falsehoods, or he assumes that readers are not intelligent enough to recognize his outright lies. Come on St George News, you can do better than this buffoonish literary lightweight.

    • Bob July 5, 2016 at 9:54 pm

      LOL, u should apply for his spot.

      • ladybugavenger July 6, 2016 at 8:34 am

        I second that. Henry, you’re hired

  • 42214 July 6, 2016 at 5:08 pm

    Ed is like Rachel Madow and Keith Olbermann rolled into one. Sexually confused and obnoxious.

  • Curtis July 7, 2016 at 8:55 am

    Vote for Trump. He is no better than Clinton but will be easier to thwart. The major media hates him, if there is a Democratic Senate they will oppose his policies. The Republicans in the House and Senate don’t like him and won’t give him everything he wants.
    On the other hand the Clintons have been in Washington for 20 years. The major media loves Bill so will give his wife a pass. Major law firms, lobbying firms and think tanks are all packed with Clinton supporters. She would probably get a Democratic Senate which means a sympathetic Supreme Court.
    Trump would mean four years of really bad governance. Clinton would change the country in disastrous ways for generations if not forever.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.