‘The time is right’; Legislature passes nondiscrimination, religious liberty bills

SALT LAKE CITY – Senate Bill 296, the Antidiscrimination and Religious Freedom Amendments, which extends housing and employment protections to LGBT individuals while also seeking a balance with freedom of religious expression, passed the Utah House Wednesday night in a 65-10 vote.

Immediately following SB 296’s passage, the House also passed Senate Bill 297 in a 66-9 vote. The bill allows government officials and employees to opt-out of performing same-sex marriages if they have religious objections, yet also ensure that someone is nonetheless available to provide the service.

Senate Bill 296 – Antidiscrimination

Unveiled just a week ago and backed by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, SB 296 now goes to the governor. Gov. Gary Herbert is expected to sign the bill into law in a ceremony Thursday at 6 p.m.

When it was announced that the bill passed, the gallery exploded into cheers and applause from assembled supporters.

Prior to the cheers, the chamber of the Utah House was quiet Wednesday evening as Rep. Brad Dee, R-Ogden, the bill’s House sponsor, took the floor. Pausing several times to compose himself as he spoke, Dee said the House had opportunity to take on very specific and important issues in the state.

“What we’ve tried to do over the last few months, with input from many stakeholders, is to try to address an issue in Utah that we sometimes feel it’s best to postpone or hide from,” Dee said. “But that’s not who we are.”

Dee said it took him at least three years to “come to fruition” on the bill, that it had been a journey for him. He also said that, while he doesn’t support the lifestyle of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community, he nonetheless has come to know and love them as people, and that they are just as deserving of the same protections as anyone else.

In the narrowest form, I’m asking you to guarantee their rights,” Dee said. “The same rights you and I have today.”

Under the terms of SB 296, employers and people in various capacities having to do with the management or sale of residential property  cannot discriminate on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation.

  • Small businesses with 14 or fewer employees are exempt
  • Residential property transactions involving less than four dwellings are exempt
  • Related transactions, such as financing and brokering the sale or rentals, are included in the antidiscrimination provisions
  • Someone who expresses personal religious views about marriage, family or sexuality in a nondisruptive and nonharassing manner in the workplace – or outside the workplace – cannot be fired or denied housing on those grounds
  • Religious organizations, their affiliates, religious schools and the Boy Scouts of America are exempt

While the majority of the Republican-dominated House passed the bill, 10 representatives remained opposed.

Rep. Jeremy Peterson, R-Ogden, said he felt the bill was going through too fast and the House hadn’t had ample time to properly vet it. He also didn’t believe the housing provisions are necessary. As a property manager himself, Peterson said, he hasn’t experienced a complaint or issue related to any LGBT tenant’s lifestyle.

“We can be a culture of kindness in this state without being compelled by the law,” he said.

Rep. Ken Ivory, R-West Jordan, also said the bill was going too fast and hadn’t been afforded the proper processes of review other bills had. “This is a constitutional dive in a very shallow pool of time and process,” he said.

“I don’t see this bill as moving too quickly,” Rep. Patrice Arent, D-Salt Lake City, said. “We’ve discussed this bill for years.”

Rep. V. Lowry Snow, R-St. George, said he dreaded the fact the matter hadn’t been resolved by now. “It is time for Utah to address the issue,” he said.

I am convinced the time is right,” Snow said. “I’m not saying this legislation is perfect, but it represents a balance for where we are at this point and time …. We must take the current when it serves, and I think that time is now.”

When the debate had ended and a call to vote was made, SB 296 quickly passed with 65-10 votes.

Representing Southern Utah in the House: Reps. Brad Last, Michael Noel, John Westwood, V. Lowry Snow and Merrill Nelson voted in favor of the measure. Reps. Don Ipson and Jon Stanard voted against it.

Representing Southern Utah in the Senate: Sens. Ralph Okerlund, Steve Urquhart and Evan Vickers voted in favor of SB 296 on March 6, when the bill passed the Senate 23-5 with 1 not voting. Sen. David Hinkins voted against the bill.

Read the full text of the bill here: 2015 S.B. 296 Antidiscrimination and Religious Freedom Amendments – proposed

Senate Bill 297 – Religious expression protections

Sponsored by Sen. Stuart Adams, R-Layton, and Rep. LaVar Christensen, R-Draper, SB 297 allows some government officials and employees to opt-out of performing same-sex marriages based on “religious or deeply held beliefs about marriage, family, and sexuality.”

However, a county clerk’s office must make sure someone is available to provide the service if others decline. If an alternate choice isn’t found, the objecting clerk or employee will be made to provide the service regardless.

The bill also prohibits government retaliation against persons in general who decline to perform marriages or provide accommodations for them based on religious belief.

The bill “strikes a proper balance,” Rep. Jacob Anderegg, R-Lehi, said. “I will support this bill,” he said.

The LDS Church also expressed its support for SB 297 and released the following statement:

The Church has been consistent in its support of marriage between a man and a woman while teaching that all people should be treated with respect. There have been various attempts discussed by lawmakers to deal with the changing definition of marriage in our state. We are supportive of SB297 because it is a more balanced and fair approach to marriage and religious freedom protections.

While SB 297 also experienced majority support in the House, passing 66-9, some lawmakers voiced their opposition.

Rep. Brian King, D-Salt Lake City, said the bill was a solution looking for a problem. He also said that government officials should leave their religious beliefs at the door, and if they couldn’t, they should be running for public office.

We believe in separating church and state,” King said.

SB 297 will be signed into law by Gov. Gary Herbert at the same time he signs SB 296 in a ceremony Thursday at 6 p.m.

Representing Southern Utah in House: Reps. Brad Last, Michael Noel, John Westwood, V. Lowry Snow, Merrill Nelson, Don Ipson and Jon Stanard voted in favor of SB 297.

Representing Southern Utah in the Senate: Sens. Ralph Okerlund, David Hinkins, Steve Urquhart and Evan Vickers voted in favor of SB 297 on March 9, when the substitute bill passed the Senate 24-5.

Read the full text of the bill here: 2015 S.B. 297 2nd Substitute – Protections for Religious Expression and Beliefs about Marriage Family Sexuality

Related posts

Email: mkessler@stgnews.com

Twitter: @STGnews

Copyright St. George News, SaintGeorgeUtah.com LLC, 2015, all rights reserved.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

9 Comments

  • ladybugavenger March 12, 2015 at 7:03 pm

    “Someone who expresses personal religious views about marriage, family or sexuality in a nondisruptive and nonharassing manner in the workplace – or outside the workplace – cannot be fired or denied housing on those grounds” does that mean I can say that I’m against gay marriage freely in the workplace? Or does that only apply to people that are for gay marriage? (Not that my employer wouldn’t make up another excuse to fire me)

  • Mesaizacd March 13, 2015 at 2:50 am

    Wow ladybug… on behalf of the 156 coworkers and myself who have come from all walks of life and believe in live and let live we are all very pleased you DO NOT work where we do…. Have a nice day ladybug

    • ladybugavenger March 13, 2015 at 10:29 am

      Your welcome mesaizaco. By your response, I’d say it only applies to people for gay marriage.

  • anybody home March 13, 2015 at 8:34 am

    This bill is a load of horse kaka…One look at the exemptions makes it clear that the anti-gay, anti-everything but their own beliefs folks in Utah have won another round. God help them.

  • sagemoon March 13, 2015 at 8:41 am

    Ladybug actually has a valid question here. The wording sounds nice and fuzzy, but can it be misused by an employer? Who decides what is non-disruptive and non-harassing? It’s open to interpretation by each employer and/or the agent they put in charge of their workers. Let’s hope we all work for open minded, easy going bosses, managements, and employers. We can always hope people will have enough common sense to know when a topic is taboo or has no relevant meaning in their workplace, but that is hoping for too much, I fear.

  • ladybugavenger March 13, 2015 at 10:44 am

    I’m not a gay hater, I’m just not for gay marriage. I’m a meth hater but I’m not against my son who did meth. I’m all for no discrimination but what I’m finding is discrimination doesn’t end with a law or a right. I don’t kiss b*** at work, it holds me back from a promotion while people with less skills and less experience get promoted. I would like to be promoted by my own merit and job performance but that doesn’t happen, at least where I work. Discrimination? In my eyes it is.
    *Edit. ellipses

    • ladybugavenger March 13, 2015 at 10:49 am

      I keep telling myself not to work so hard, like others, but yet I have not been able to slow down. So yes people shouldn’t be discriminated against for sexual orientation. Heck, there is already a federal law for that. But people always find another excuse to discriminate and laws aren’t going to stop it.

  • fun bag March 13, 2015 at 7:54 pm

    gay marriage = sinful and an influence of Satan. end of story…

    • anybody home March 14, 2015 at 12:24 pm

      Did you have a revelation or did you just make that up yourself?

Leave a Reply