Utah disappointed at EPA listing Gunnison sage-grouse as threatened

Photo of Gunnison sage-grouse near Monticello, Utah, undated | Photo courtesy of Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, St. George News

SALT LAKE CITY A decision to list the Gunnison sage-grouse as threatened under the Endangered Species Act could hurt the bird more than help it, said Greg Sheehan, the director of the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.

Photo of Gunnison sage-grouse near Monticello, Monticello, Utah, undated | Photo courtesy of Utah Department of Wildlife Resources, St. George News
Photo of Gunnison sage-grouse near Monticello, Monticello, Utah, undated | Photo courtesy of Utah Department of Wildlife Resources, St. George News

“Placing the bird under the oversight of the federal government will greatly reduce our ability to help the bird,” Sheehan said.

Found mostly in southwestern Colorado, a small number of Gunnison sage-grouse also live in San Juan County in southeastern Utah.  On Nov. 12, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced that, despite years of work in both states, the bird warrants listing as a threatened species.

Putting the bird under the management authority of the federal government will create roadblocks that will make it difficult to complete work to help the species,” Sheehan said.

For example, if the Utah DWR wants to partner with a landowner and a federal agency—to complete a habitat project to help the grouse—they can’t simply launch into the project and do the work.  Instead, the project now has to go through a federal review process that Sheehan calls “tedious and time-consuming.”

Photo of Gunnison sage-grouse near Monticello, Monticello, Utah, undated | Photo courtesy of Utah Department of Wildlife Resources, St. George News
Photo of Gunnison sage-grouse near Monticello, Monticello, Utah, undated | Photo courtesy of Utah Department of Wildlife Resources, St. George News

Work has been underway since 1996 to help Gunnison sage-grouse in San Juan County, Sheehan said.  Those efforts include the establishment of local working groups.  The groups have brought landowners, local government officials, state

and federal agencies, and universities together to work on cooperative research and habitat projects to help the birds.

“We’re disappointed that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service believes that extensive conservation efforts in Utah and Colorado aren’t sufficient enough to protect the species,” Sheehan said. “The USFWS hasn’t given many of these efforts the time needed to show the efforts work.”

Sheehan praised the work local government officials, landowners and farmers have done to help the species in San Juan County.

“We appreciate the work local government officials, landowners and farmers have done to try to avoid this listing by the USFWS,” Sheehan said. “Landowners and farmers are the key to helping the species.”

Sens. Orrin Hatch and Mike Lee released the following joint statement on the FWS decision:

Once again, the federal government has put forward new regulations that will make life difficult for Utahns and disrupt the Utah economy.  As a result of this decision, even more land on which Utahns have depended for generations to support their families will become subject to onerous restrictions imposed by bureaucrats in Washington, D.C.  Worst of all, this listing was simply unnecessary.  As our own Director of Utah’s Division of Wildlife Resources has said, federal protections will actually make it more difficult to help the bird, by undermining the voluntary efforts of landowners, local officials, and environmental groups that have successfully maintained the Gunnison Sage Grouse population and conserved their habitat for nearly two decades.  Despite these new regulations, we will continue to fight to protect the rights of states to manage wildlife within their borders.”

Hatch and Lee have been actively involved in the debate over the need for ESA protections of the Gunnison Sage Grouse.  They have co-written a letter alongside five other senators and representatives from Utah and Colorado requesting an extension of the comment period of the proposed rules for the Gunnison Sage Grouse in order to get local communities involved.  The Greater Sage Grouse—a cousin to the Gunnison Sage Grouse—has a larger presence in the West and has been nominated for ESA protections.  A listing of the Greater Sage Grouse would be even more devastating than today’s listing of the Gunnison Sage Grouse.  Both senators cosponsored legislation earlier this year that would require the secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior to provide assistance to states in developing their own conservation and management plans to protect and recover sage grouse species.

Updated 1:30 p.m. to include statement from Utah senators.

Related posts

Email: news@stgnews.com

Twitter: @STGnews

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

9 Comments

  • Koolaid November 14, 2014 at 2:34 pm

    Hatch and Lee, appealing to the gun idiots for more votes.

  • Wilbur November 14, 2014 at 3:14 pm

    (pathetic, there, Koolaid drinker, just pathetic)

  • PROTECT THE SHEEP November 14, 2014 at 4:58 pm

    make it harder for mines, oil and gas extraction. Lets all feel sorry for the poor rich oil/gas/mine executives… boo hoo

    • Devo November 15, 2014 at 9:46 am

      You idiot Sheep, don’t you think cheaper oil, gas and coal means lower prices for consumers, of which the lower and middle class are helped the most by putting hard earned wages into their pockets? Last time I checked businesses were supposed to make money too, you communist!!

  • arrowone November 14, 2014 at 6:41 pm

    When has government not screwed something up? If you think that land will be managed correctly by the feds, I’ve got some property to sell you.

  • Chris November 14, 2014 at 8:13 pm

    The EPA does not make endangered species listings, contrary to what the title of this article says. Those listings come from the USFWS.

  • crescent November 14, 2014 at 10:16 pm

    The headline seems misleading. I don’t think the EPA has anything to do with the listing. The Fish and Wildlife Service does that, not the EPA. EPA is more into pollution control, air and water quality, and so on.

  • St.george nazinews November 15, 2014 at 12:12 am

    This news orgasim is simple a low grade of neo nazi that have control of the press. Will all the staff please say hello to hilter when you make it into ….
    Ed. ellipsis.

  • RICHARD C. MEN November 15, 2014 at 2:16 pm

    I couldn’t tell by the photo if that was a hen or a cock. Which one is protected or should both use protection whose responsibility it is. I used to own chickens 2 got out of the coup and and it was hard for my neighbor Mrs. Whittington to tell if she saw my hen but she certainly had seen my cock.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.