Lee: What’s next for conservatives; opportunity crisis, legislative solutions

WASHINGTON D.C. –Sen. Mike Lee delivered a speech at The Heritage Foundation yesterday titled “What’s Next For Conservatives,” in which he posited reasons the Grand Old Party is out of touch today and outlined opportunities it faces along with legislative initiatives he is bringing to promote a problem-solving conservative agenda.

Following are excerpts from Lee’s speech with captions added. The full text is attached under resources below.

Opening remarks

… It has been quite a month in Washington.

It began with our effort to stop Obamacare — a goal that all Republicans share even if we have not always agreed about just how to pursue it. And it is ending with powerful practical proof of just why stopping Obamacare is so essential. This law is unaffordable and unfair; it’s getting worse all the time.

As of today, President Obama’s policy is to fine any American who does not buy a product that his bungled website will not sell them.

… a month like the one we have been through should lead us not only to re-commit to this essential, ongoing struggle, but also to step back and ask ourselves where we should be headed more generally.

Conservatives’ history, GOP out of touch

… I think the most instructive history that conservatives can learn from today is our own.

… The ideas that defined and propelled the Reagan Revolution did not come down from a mountain etched in stone tablets. They were forged in an open, roiling, diverse debate about how conservatism could truly meet the challenges of that day.  …

Together, that generation of conservatives transformed a movement that was anti-statist, anti-communist, and anti-establishment, and made it pro-reform.

Contrary to the establishment’s complaints, conservatives in the late 1970s did not start a “civil war.” They started a (mostly) civil debate. Because of that confident and deeply conservative choice – to argue rather than quarrel, to persuade rather than simply purge – the vanguards of the establishment never knew what hit them. …

It’s hard to believe, but by the time we reach November 2016, we will be about as far – chronologically speaking – from Reagan’s election as Reagan’s election was from D-Day! Yet as the decades pass and a new generation of Americans faces a new generation of problems, the party establishment clings to its 1970s agenda like a security blanket.

The result is that to many Americans today, especially to the underprivileged and middle class, or those who have come of age or immigrated since Reagan left office the Republican Party may not seem to have much of a relevant reform message at all.

This is the reason the G.O.P. can seem so out of touch. And it is also the reason we find ourselves in such internal disarray. …

To revive and reunify our movement, we must fill the void with new and innovative policy ideas. … And three recent efforts show that we still can.

Jim DeMint, Tom Coburn, and Jeff Flake’s crusade against earmarks, Paul Ryan’s heroic work on Medicare reform, and Rand Paul’s stand against domestic drone-strike authority all demonstrate that thoughtful, idea-driven conservatism is as powerful today as it has ever been.

It’s time for another Great Debate, and we should welcome all input. Grassroots and establishment. Conservatives and moderates. Libertarians and traditionalists. Interventionists and non-interventionists. Economic conservatives and social conservatives. All are part of our movement, and all are vital to our success – so all should be welcome in this debate.

Opportunity crisis

I submit that the great challenge of our generation is America’s growing crisis of stagnation and sclerosis – a crisis that comes down to a shortage of opportunities.

This opportunity crisis presents itself in three principal ways: immobility among the poor, trapped in poverty; insecurity in the middle class, where families just can’t seem to get ahead; and cronyist privilege at the top, where political and economic elites unfairly profit at everyone else’s expense.

Anti-poverty, upward mobility agenda

First, we need a new, comprehensive anti-poverty, upward-mobility agenda designed not simply (to) help people in poverty, but to help and empower them to get out.

Here, my home state of Utah can be a guide. A recent study found the Salt Lake City metropolitan area to be the most upwardly mobile region in the United States. In an addition to a well-managed, limited government where jobs and opportunity abound, Utah is home to an enormously successful private welfare system led by churches, businesses, and community groups and volunteers. …

This new agenda must recognize that work for able-bodied adults is not a necessary evil, but an essential pathway to personal happiness and prosperity. And it should also force Republicans and Democrats to acknowledge that there is another marriage debate in this country – one concerning fatherless children, economic inequality, and broken communities – that deserves as much public attention as the other.

Anti-cronyism agenda

Second, we need a new, comprehensive anti-cronyism agenda, to break up the corrupt nexus of big government, big business, and big special interests. We need a new corporate tax code and regulatory system to eliminate lobbyists’ loopholes and giveaways, level the playing field between businesses, big and small, and foster a dynamic, globally competitive private sector.

We need to end subsidies that unfairly favor some businesses and industries over others. And the Republican Party must make a fundamental commitment to end its support for corporate welfare in any form – including for the Big Banks. …

Working class, middle class agenda

… the third essential piece of our new agenda: a new conservatism of the working and middle class. Today, working families’ take-home pay is flat, but the staples of middle-class security and opportunity – health care, education, homeownership, work-life balance, and children – are becoming harder to afford all the time.

Progressives say we just need more programs to give working families more government money. But as we have seen once again over the last five years, big government creates opportunity for the middlemen at the expense of the middle class. It only masks the broken policies that artificially raise costs and restrict access in the first place. …

The first and most important policy goal Republicans must adopt to improve the lives of middle-class families is, and will remain, the full repeal of Obamacare.

It’s important to understand why. Health care is one of the main reasons why the cost of living in the middle class is increasing too quickly for many Americans to keep up. At the same time, it is the main reason why government spending and debt are out of control.

The law the Democrats enacted on a party-line vote in 2010 is going to make both of those problems worse – accelerating health care costs both for families and the government.

Legislative solutions

To do my part, today I want to talk about four pieces of legislation specifically designed to address four leading challenges facing middle-class families today: the cost of raising children, the difficulties of work-life balance, the time Americans lose away from work and home, stuck in traffic, and the rising costs of and restricted access to quality higher education. These bills won’t solve every problem under the sun. Raising a family isn’t supposed to be easy. But each would restore to working families more of the freedom they deserve to pursue their happiness: to earn a good living and build a good life.

Tax reform

… I will be introducing in the Senate the “Family Fairness and Opportunity Tax Reform Act.” My plan calls for a 15 percent tax rate on all income up to $87,850 – or $175,700 for married couples. Income above that threshold would be taxed at 35 percent. Like any good conservative tax-reform plan, my bill also simplifies the code, eliminating or reforming most deductions. …

So my plan eliminates this anti-family bias in the tax code, while improving pro-growth incentives for the economy.

Labor law reform

… today, federal labor laws restrict the way moms and dads and everyone else can use their time. That’s because many of those laws were written decades ago, when most women didn’t work outside the home. Because of these laws, an hourly employee who works overtime is not allowed to take comp-time or flex time. Even if she prefers it, her  boss can’t even offer it. …

In May, the House of Representatives passed the “Working Families Flexibility Act of 2013,” sponsored by Representative Martha Roby of Alabama, to equalize flex-time rules for all workers. And this week I am introducing companion legislation in the Senate.

Transportation reform

House-hunting middle class families today often face a Catch-22. They can stretch their finances to near bankruptcy to afford a home close to work. Or they can choose a home in a more affordable neighborhood so far away from work that they miss soccer games, piano recitals, and family dinner while stuck in gridlocked traffic. The solution is not more government-subsidized mortgages or housing programs.

A real solution involves building more roads. More roads, bridges, lanes, and mass-transitsystems. Properly planned and located, these projects would help create new jobs, newcommunities, more affordable homes, shorter commuting times, and greater opportunity for businesses and families. …

Congressman Tom Graves and I are going to introduce the Transportation Empowerment Act. Under our bill, the federal gas tax would be phased down over five years from 18.4 cents per gallon, to 3.7 cents. And highway authority would be transferred proportionately from the federal government to the states.

Higher education reform

… While it’s true that college has never been for everyone, as we transition from an industrial economy to an information and service-based economy, post-secondary education cannot be a luxury available only to a select few.

Some combination of higher education and vocational training should at least be an option for just about everyone who graduates from high school. …

Because eligibility for federal student loans is tied to the federal accreditation regime, we shut out students who want to learn, teachers who want to teach, transformative technologies, and cost-saving innovations. …

I will be introducing the Higher Education Reform and Opportunity Act. Under this legislation, the existing accreditation system would remain unchanged. …

But my plan would give states a new option to enter into agreements with the Department of Education to create their own, alternative accreditation systems to open up new options for students qualifying for federal aid.

Attitude, agenda

Especially in the wake of recent controversies, many conservatives are more frustrated with the establishment than ever before. And we have every reason to be. But however justified, frustration is not a platform. Anger is not an agenda. And outrage, as a habit, is not even conservative. Outrage, resentment, and intolerance are gargoyles of the Left. For us, optimism is not just a message – it’s a principle. American conservatism, at its core, is about gratitude, and cooperation, and trust, and above all hope. It is also about inclusion. Successful political movements are about identifying converts, not heretics. …

To deserve victory, conservatives have to do more than pick a fight. We have to win a debate. And to do that, we need more than just guts. We need an agenda.


Full text of Lee’s speech:  Sen. Mike Lee – What’s next for conservatives 20131029

Related posts


New from STGnews.com

St. George News App for Android®

St. George News App for iPhone®  

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @JoyceKuzmanic

Copyright St. George News, SaintGeorgeUtah.com LLC, 2013, all rights reserved.


Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!


  • Combat Vet and Democrat October 30, 2013 at 9:39 am

    I like most of these ideas but, what about the details? One question; how do you build roads, bridges, highways and reduce the tax that pays for construction projects at the same time?

  • Ron October 30, 2013 at 10:57 am

    I was looking for an alternative to Obamacare? What is the conservative position? Do we just go back to the old model where good health care is available to those who can afford it while those who can’t just go without? Or use the ER, which the rest of us wind up paying for?

  • philiplo October 30, 2013 at 11:34 am

    “The law the Democrats enacted on a party-line vote in 2010 is going to make both of those problems worse – accelerating health care costs both for families and the government.”
    Not according to the CBO, the accepted arbiter regarding future costs of implemented law. Their figures are available to anyone who cares to look. Where are yours, Mr. Lee?

  • Karen October 30, 2013 at 11:37 am

    This article should be titled “Mike Lee Attempts to Re-Invent Himself.” Fresh from causing the government shutdown that cost the state of Utah more than $30 million dollars in tourist revenues, Mike Lee is trying to rehabilitate his image with feel-good messages and broad generalities. Anyone willing to destroy the economy of the United States via the shutdown and failure to raise the debt ceiling needs to be voted out of office in 2016. He called it a “fight worth having”. I call it malfeasance in office.

    • Robb Willie October 30, 2013 at 3:28 pm

      You should feel as stupid as you sound. Destroy the economy? Please. Hyperventilate much? And none of your bile is directed at Obama and the Dems? It’s all Mike Lee’s fault. Hack.

      • Bender October 31, 2013 at 8:52 am

        Another local genius raised on a daily diet of Glenn Beck and Fox News. You may not be a critical thinker Robb, but you’ve got the bile spewing nailed.

  • philiplo October 30, 2013 at 11:38 am

    The Republican party at the national level has had zero ideas since President Obama took office. Note the inability of the Republican lead House of Representatives to get ANYTHING done. This current house is on pace to be the LEAST productive congress EVER, which wasn’t easy because of the failures of the PREVIOUS one (also led by John Boehner).

    • whilbur October 30, 2013 at 3:15 pm

      house has passed lots of measures – barack-led senate has stymied all of them.

      you’re a dem fool politico – phillipio

    • Craig October 30, 2013 at 7:20 pm

      “The Republican party at the national level has had zero ideas since President Obama took office.”

      Correction: They have had NO Good ideas since Reagan left office. My BEST idea for them is to retire Hatch and McCain. When Boehner sobers up, he can go too. And please, don’t let Santorum return. He always looks constipated. Must be because he is so uptight.

  • elliemae100 October 31, 2013 at 2:25 am

    So this site is a forum for Mike Lee to spout his BS? Without attempting to report anything, you print word-for-word the press releases he sends out. If you want to be taken seriously – and it’s obvious you don’t – you won’t be a funnel for politicians.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.